Scientific writing requires evidence. You cannot just make it up! References to other (scientific and reliable) publications show that you are aware of the background of your topic, of current research, and of relevant official data. They also show that you know how to use all that information to support your findings.
There are three ways in which you can include information from sources in your own text: quoting, paraphrasing, or summarizing.
If the exact words of the original document are important, you should quote the text. This is for example the case when it matters which formulation the author used. Put the quotation between double quotation marks to indicate that the words are not your own and add a reference.
Be aware: long quotations with 40 words or more are considered as block quotations and are formatted in an isolated block without quotation marks.
When you quote, bear in mind that:
Some examples of direct quotations:
Source: McAdoo, T. (2010). How to cite direct quotations |
An example of a block quotation:
Source: Sigler, M. (2014). The effects of plastic pollution on aquatic wildlife: current situations and future solutions
In many cases, you want to put the idea(s) from another’s work into your own text and therefore you will paraphrase it. Paraphrasing rather than using direct quotations gives you the opportunity to show that you understand the idea(s) being discussed. A paraphrase is approximately the same length as the original text.
Paraphrase a text by describing the original idea(s) in your own words and adding a reference.
When you paraphrase:
View this video about paraphrasing:
Summarizing means that you describe a significant part of someone else’s work in a few sentences. In this way you are able to include a complete overview of the ideas of someone else’s work into your own.
The rules for summarizing are the same as for paraphrasing: you should use your own words and add a reference.
View this video about how to write a summary:
When information is considered as “common knowledge”, you don’t need to add a reference. “Common knowledge” is something which anyone familiar with a field of research is expected to know. In case of doubt, it is better to add an unnecessary reference than leave one out which is required.
When you publish a text, you want other people to credit you when they use your work. The same applies to the authors whose work you use! Using someone else’s work or findings without indicating that you have done so is plagiarism.
There are certain rules for the order of the references in your reference list as well as for the formatting of the references themselves. These rules are determined by the citation style you choose. A reference must contain enough elements to be traceable. There are many different citation styles available.
Usually, you will be told to use a specific reference style, so you can simply look up the style on the internet or in a book and make sure you follow its rules. If you can choose your own style, it is a matter of personal taste. Just make sure you consistently use a single reference style.
All reproduced images, photographs, tables and figures in your paper must be cited three times: in the text, in the caption beneath the image (including a copyright statement) and in the reference list. A copyright statement is not necessary if you have bought a stock photo or if the image is your own work. In that case use the words “own work” in the caption or add a note in your text stating that photo’s or drawings without reference are your own.
In the caption under the image you have to put the following elements:
Example:
Figure 7: Light rail Houston. From “Wikimedia Commons,” by M. Haase, 2006 (https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Light_Rail_Houston.jpg). Licensed under CC BY 2.5.
In-text citation of this example:
As shown in fig. 7 Houston is one of the cities in the USA with a light rail system …
In the reference list:
Haase, M. (2006). Light rail Houston [Photograph]. https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Light_Rail_Houston.jpg
When formatting references, using reference management software is a real help. Check the TUlib module about Reference management to learn more.
If you don’t want to use reference management software (yet), you can use one of the free online tools to format the references for your paper; for example:
If you use these tools don’t forget to check your references!
Reference styles can be divided into two main groups: author-date styles and numbered styles. Author-date styles are sometimes also called parenthesized styles.
| Author-date style
(Parenthesized styles) |
Numbered style | |
| In-text reference | (Smith, 2016) or
Smith found … (2016). |
My article text [1] or
My article text1 |
| Reference list | References ordered alphabetically, by author’s name. | References ordered numerically, in the order in which they appear in the text. |
| Advantage | A reader can recognize important original texts from the in-text reference, without having to check the reference list. | A reader who wants to check all references while reading a paper, can easily move from one reference to the next without having to search for the next author’s name in a (long) list. |
| Disadvantage | Longer in-text references (for example, references with multiple authors or more than one reference in the same place) can make a text more difficult to read. | In-text references do not contain any useful information themselves. |
| Examples | APA, Chicago, Harvard | Nature, Vancouver, IEEE |
For examples in APA style look at the APA 7th Citation Examples.
Sometimes these terms are mixed up, but formally a reference list is a list of all publications (including figures, graphs, tables, datasets etc.) an author refers to (either cites or paraphrases) in a document to:
A reference list must be ordered and formatted consistently, according to a single reference style.
A bibliography is more extensive: it also includes works the author read in preparation to writing a document, but did not actually refer to. A bibliography is usually only included in a longer publication, such as a book or a PhD-thesis, while a reference list is customary in all academic writing.
BibMe. (2017). BibMe. http://www.bibme.org/
Cite This For Me. (2017). Harvard Citation Generator. http://www.citethisforme.com/citation-generator/harvard
Frick, T. (2005). What is plagiarism at Indiana University? Indiana University. https://www.indiana.edu/~tedfrick/plagiarism/item1.html
Lee, C. (2016. January 26). Navigation copyright for reproduced images: Part 4. Writing the copyright statement. http://blog.apastyle.org/apastyle/2016/01/navigating-copyright-part-4.html
McAdoo, T. (2010, March 25). How to cite direct quotations. http://blog.apastyle.org/apastyle/2010/03/how-to-cite-direct-quotations.html
Sigler, M. (2014). The effects of plastic pollution on aquatic wildlife: current situations and future solutions. Water, Air, & Soil Pollution 225(2184). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11270-014-2184-6
TU Delft. (2017). Fraud & Plagiarism. https://www.tudelft.nl/en/student/legal-position/fraud-plagiarism/